Lalit Modi, the IPL's founding commissioner, says the league is losing about Rs 2,400 crore each season because it cut 20 home-and-away matches. He argues the reduced 74‑match schedule breaches the original franchise agreement and hurts team revenue. Modi urges a return to the double round‑robin format promised to owners.

Lalit Modi, the man who helped launch the Indian Premier League and later became its first commissioner, has taken to the media with a blunt assessment of the tournament’s current structure. In a recent interview, he argued that the league is losing roughly Rs 2,400 crore each season because it no longer follows the original home-and-away format that was promised to the franchise owners. The claim has sparked a fresh debate among administrators, team investors, and fans about whether the IPL should revert to its earlier schedule or continue experimenting with a leaner calendar.

The criticism comes at a moment when the IPL’s commercial value appears to be soaring. Two of the league’s most high-profile franchises, Royal Challengers Bengaluru and Rajasthan Royals, were recently sold for a combined fee of about Rs 31,000 crore. Those figures suggest that the market still believes the brand has massive growth potential. Yet Modi’s warning points to a disconnect between the headline numbers and the underlying revenue model that teams depend on to justify such astronomical investments. For many observers, the issue is not simply about the number of matches, but about the principle of delivering on a contractual promise.

The Original Format and Its Significance

When the league expanded to ten teams in 2022, the blueprint laid out for owners was a double round-robin where each side would meet every other side twice, once at home and once away. That arrangement would produce a 90-match league phase followed by the usual four knockout games. Instead, the competition has been running a 74-match schedule, a reduction of 16 fixtures that, according to Modi, translates into a direct loss of revenue for every franchise. The home-and-away concept was marketed as a core selling point for the IPL’s franchise model. Teams were told that they would receive an equal share of the gate receipts, broadcast fees, and sponsorship money generated from every match they host.

  • Original IPL blueprint called for a double round‑robin with home and away games for each team.
  • The current schedule cuts 16 matches, removing 20 home fixtures per season.
  • Each match generates revenue that is split equally between the BCCI and the participating clubs.
  • Franchise agreements were based on a specific match count, making the reduction a potential breach.
  • Home games are crucial for fan engagement and local ownership feeling.
  • All ten teams will have Indian captains in the 2026 season, marking a new era.
  • Balancing commercial interests with franchise rights is essential for the league's future.

In practice, the revenue split works such that the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) retains half of the total earnings from a game, while the remaining half is divided among the participating clubs. When a team loses a home fixture, it forfeits not only ticket sales but also a share of the broadcast and advertising income tied to that event. Modi stresses that the loss of 20 matches per season is not an abstract figure; it is a concrete shortfall that affects cash flow, player salaries, and the ability of owners to invest in infrastructure. “For every game, the BCCI gets 50 percent, and the remaining 50 percent is distributed to teams,” he said in his conversation with Sportstar. “Consequently, teams are now losing out on 20 games. It is a contractual obligation, given the fees they are paying, to provide them with home-and-away fixtures.”

  • Modi claims the IPL loses about Rs 2,400 crore each season due to fewer home games.
  • The league currently runs 74 matches instead of the promised 90.
  • Revenue is split 50‑50 between the BCCI and the clubs for each match.
  • Losing home fixtures cuts ticket sales, broadcast fees and sponsorship income for teams.
  • The debate pits commercial efficiency against contractual promises to franchise owners.
lalit modi calls out ipl format

The language he used underscores the legal dimension of the dispute - the franchise agreements were signed on the basis of a specific match count, and any deviation could be seen as a breach of those terms. Beyond the financial calculus, the original format also carries a symbolic weight. The IPL was designed to bring top-level cricket to fans across the country, giving each city a chance to host the excitement of a marquee contest. When a team plays only a handful of home games, it diminishes the sense of ownership and engagement among local supporters.

Cutting 20 home games is not just a number, it hits cash flow and player salaries.
The league promised equal home opportunities, and changing that feels like breaking a contract.
Fans lose the chance to see marquee matches in their own cities when the schedule shrinks.
Lalit Modi Demands IPL Return to Home-Away Schedule

A New Era for the IPL

In a recent development, the IPL has made history by having all 10 teams start the 2026 season with Indian captains. This milestone marks a new era for the league, with renewed direction and high expectations. The appointment of Indian captains is seen as a positive step, as it allows for greater representation and leadership from within the country. However, the issue of the home-and-away format remains a pressing concern, and it will be interesting to see how the BCCI and the franchise owners address this issue in the coming seasons.

As the IPL continues to grow and evolve, it is essential to strike a balance between commercial interests and the needs of the teams and fans. The league must ensure that it delivers on its promises and provides a fair and competitive environment for all participants. By doing so, the IPL can continue to thrive and maintain its position as one of the premier T20 leagues in the world.

FAQ

Why does Lalit Modi think the IPL is losing money?
Modi points to the drop from 90 to 74 matches, which removes 20 home games and the associated ticket, broadcast and sponsorship income for each franchise. He says this shortfall translates into a loss of roughly Rs 2,400 crore per season.
What was the original IPL format promised to franchise owners?
The original plan for ten teams was a double round‑robin where each side played every other side twice, once at home and once away, creating a 90‑match league phase followed by four knockout games.
How does the revenue split work in the IPL?
The BCCI keeps half of the total earnings from each match, and the remaining half is shared among the participating clubs. When a team loses a home fixture it misses out on its share of gate receipts, broadcast fees and advertising revenue.
Has the IPL made any recent changes that could affect this debate?
The 2026 season will start with all ten teams led by Indian captains, a move meant to boost local representation. However, the home‑away format issue remains unresolved.
What could happen if the IPL does not restore the original schedule?
Franchise owners may view the reduced match count as a breach of contract, potentially leading to legal disputes or reduced investment in the league.
lalit modi calls out ipl format