Podcast: Quarterfinal Chaos — and more

The latest episode of the 32 Thoughts Podcast examines the unpredictable nature of quarterfinal play, highlighting key upsets and controversial decisions that shaped the tournament's next stage.

Retired MMA fighter Tiki Ghosn was seen on video getting into an altercation with Nurideen Shabazz, an influencer-turned-boxer known as Deen the Great. The video has gone viral.

Ghosn was seen landing a strike to the face of Shabazz, punching him out at a party following a confrontation that appeared to be started by the influencer. Shabazz could be heard questioning why Ghosn would deny knowing who he was.

"You do know who I am," Shabazz was heard saying during the exchange.

"I don't know you," Ghosn told Shabazz. "Nice to meet you, though."

Things would escalate further after Shabazz continued his questioning of Ghosn. The men were quickly separated.

Shabazz was also seen being slapped by powerlifter Larry Wheels in a separate video from earlier in the week. That incident was referenced by Ghosn in the viral video during the exchange with Shabazz.

Both incidents can be found on Shabazz’s KICK stream. Former MMA fighter Quinton “Rampage” Jackson was seen in both videos. Ghosn is Jackson’s manager.

Who is Tiki Ghosn?

Ghosn produced a 10-7-0 record as a fighter, winning his last fight in March 2008 while snapping a streak of five consecutive losses.

The Southern California native was previously managed by current UFC president Dana White. Ghosn has worked as a coach on the Ultimate Fighter and worked with several notable names in the MMA world, including Tito Ortiz, Ken Shamrock and Michael Bisping.

Who is Deen the Great?

Shabazz won his first seven boxing fights; his second win was the only non-exhibition fight he's competed in.

He suffered his first loss to Amado Vargas in an exhibition fight in December 2025.

Shabszz has also served as a YouTube streamer since 2013 and has more than 528K subscribers.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Tiki Ghosn, Deen the Great get in altercation in viral video

Atlético Madrid leave Belgium with a 3–3 draw that, on paper, keeps everything alive.

The Champions League play-off tie is level, the damage limited against Club Brugge, and the return leg at the Metropolitano still up for grabs.

And yet, as the players walked off at the Jan Breydelstadion, the prevailing emotion was not relief.

It was something closer to unease.

It was a night where Atlético flirted with losing control and were fortunate that the consequences stopped short of catastrophe.

The scoreboard may be level, but the performance suggested instability.

An undeserved lead, and a deserved correction

The strangest part of the evening was the halftime scoreline: 2-0. Atlético went into the break two goals up without ever looking like the better side.

Club Brugge were sharper, braver, more cohesive. They moved the ball with clarity and attacked with purpose.

Atleti, in contrast, defended in stretches and struck with efficiency, but never with authority.

In knockout football, control is often secondary to impact. A two-goal lead away from home should settle nerves. It should slow the tempo, shrink the pitch, force the opponent into frustration.

Instead, the restart brought hesitation and within 15 minutes, the advantage had evaporated.

It was not a chaotic collapse. What made it concerning was how ordinary it looked. Brugge simply increased their intensity and Atlético struggled to recalibrate. The lines became stretched, the distances widened, and the confidence drained.

To their credit, Atleti found a third goal just as the match threatened to spiral completely. That moment mattered. It spoke to a residual edge within the squad — a refusal to fold entirely.

But even that surge did not reset the emotional balance of the game. Brugge equalized again in the 89th minute, 10 minutes after the Joel Ordóñez own goal. And this time, the parity felt deserved.

Over 90 minutes, the draw was not cruel. It was fair.

Targeted and exposed

For a squad containing so much individual quality, Atlético have often looked oddly disconnected this season. Brugge seemed to understand that.

Julián Alvarez converted his eighth-minute penalty with authority, a reminder that La Araña still carries venom. There was a sharpness to the strike that hinted at resurgence. But beyond that moment, his influence faded again.

Ademola Lookman, who has injected life into Atlético’s attack since his arrival, found the evening far less accommodating. Brugge compressed space intelligently, doubled up quickly and denied him the open lanes that have allowed him to accelerate matches in recent weeks. Lookman still found a goal on the stroke of halftime by reacting sharply in the box — an attacker’s instinct that should not be overlooked — but his broader influence was muted.

Giuliano Simeone also endured one of his more difficult nights. His usual intensity felt rushed rather than controlled, and defensively he struggled to contain his flank. Brugge repeatedly tested that side, sensing vulnerability.

And then there was Nahuel Molina.

Coming off one of his best performances of the season against Barcelona, Molina’s regression here was jarring. All three Brugge goals originated from his side of the pitch, and while football is rarely reducible to a single culprit, the positional lapses were difficult to ignore.

On the first goal, he hesitated and retreated from the corner sequence, leaving Marc Pubill exposed two-versus-one. On the second, he drifted centrally into no man’s land as Giuliano was isolated, allowing a straightforward cross across goal. On the third, and perhaps the most damaging, he failed to track Tzolis’ run despite gestures from Pubill to shift wider, and the finish was inevitable.

This is not about scapegoating. Simeone himself was blunt when asked what needs improvement: “Everything.” That word carried weight. It suggested a systemic issue rather than an individual one.

But it was evident that Brugge identified specific pressure points and attacked them repeatedly. Atlético were not overwhelmed by brilliance. They were undone by preparation. And they did not respond quickly enough.

A season narrowing, and tension rising

There is little margin left in Atlético’s season. The league campaign has long since drifted. What remains, in truth, are the Champions League and the Copa del Rey. Even in the latter, where Atlético hold a commanding first-leg advantage over Barcelona, nerves persist. That alone speaks to the emotional volatility this team has created.

As for Europe, being eliminated in the playoff round would be deeply damaging — competitively and psychologically. A season feeling effectively over in February would be a new shade of disappointment, even for a fanbase that has learned to endure.

Crucially, this tie is still level. The Rojiblancos will return to the Metropolitano knowing they control their fate. But they cannot afford to reproduce the passivity shown in Brugge. They cannot allow the game to drift and hope efficiency rescues them.

Brugge have shown they are organized, fearless, and tactically disciplined. They will not arrive in Madrid intimidated. And if the second leg begins without clarity or intensity from Atleti, the stadium will feel it. The nerves will surface quickly.

Before that though, Espanyol await in LaLiga — a fixture that might feel peripheral emotionally but remains vital structurally. Atleti are not mathematically secure in the top four, and the consequences of slipping there would compound everything else.

Cholo Simeone has always preached partido a partido. This season, that mantra feels less philosophical and more literal. Each game carries disproportionate weight. Each performance shapes the mood around the club.

The draw in Brugge keeps Atlético alive. It does not calm the doubts. What happens next will determine whether this was merely a warning — or the beginning of something unraveling.